The U.S. military UAV market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 10% between 2010 and 2015, says “U.S. Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) Market Forecast 2010-2015″, a new research report from Market Research Media. The report finds that the U.S. military UAV market will generate $ 62 Billion revenues over the period 2010 – 2015.

The report provides detailed year-by-year (2010 – 2015) forecasts for the following U.S. U.S. Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) market segments:

• R&D, tests and evaluation
• Unmanned Air Vehicles
• Payloads
• Ground Control Systems
• Service, support and maintenance
• Training
• Data management
• Revenues by UAV Groups (by vehicle airspeed, weight, and operating altitude)

Market Research Media analysts have found that there is a widening gap between growing UAV fleet and UAV infrastructure development, especially in such sectors as training; service, support and maintenance; and data management. This gap creates a number of market opportunities for UAV vendors, both large defense contractors and small technology companies.

“More aircraft help us manage their maintenance, but do not affect the number of Predators we can fly at any given time. More ground control stations would be helpful, and the system is trying to produce more. But even if we had more ground control stations and aircraft, we would not be able to employ them without more pilots and sensor operators,” said Lieutenant General Walter E. Buchanan III, Commander U.S. Central Command Air Forces. “The effectiveness of UAVs as surveillance systems is unmatched, and has had great effect in both theaters of operation.”

Military procurement of UAS, including unmanned aircrafts, payloads, CGS makes the DoD the single largest consumer of UAV technology in the world. We can predict with a great deal of confidence that the U.S. Government will continue to invest in UAS as much as needed to keep its dominance, both technological and pure force factor, in the next decades.

Table of Contents
1. Market Report Scope & Methodology
1.1. Scope
1.2. Research Methodology

2. Executive Summary
2.1. Key Report Findings

3. UAV: Classification, Major Systems, Key Capabilities, Inventories and Trends
3.1. Small UAS (SUAS)
3.1.1. Battlefield Airman Targeting Micro Air Vehicle (BATMAV): Wasp III
3.1.2. Force Protection Airborne Surveillance System: RQ-11 Raven
3.1.3. Scan Eagle interim solution
3.1.4. RQ-7B Shadow 200 21

3.2. Medium UAS
3.2.1. MQ-1C Extended Range Multi-Purpose UAS (Sky Warrior)
3.2.2. Vertical Take-off and Landing Tactical Unmanned Air Vehicle (Navy Fire Scout)
3.2.3. Army Fire Scout
3.2.4. MQ-1 Predator
3.2.5. MQ-9 Reaper

3.3. Large UAS
3.3.1. RQ-4 Global Hawk
3.3.2. Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (BAMS)

3.4. Prospective UAV Platform Capabilities
3.4.1. Prospective Technology: Fuel Cell Powered UAV
3.4.2. Navy Unmanned Combat Air System Demonstration UCAS-D
3.5. UAV Cost Factor
3.6. Major UAV Manufacturers

4. Payloads
4.1. Multi-mission Modular Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Payloads Initiative
4.2. Airborne Signals Intelligence Payload
4.3. Multi-Platform Radar Technology Insertion Program
4.4. Sensor Suites: Market Opportunities for Small/Midsize Technology Companies
4.5. Weapons
4.6. Payloads: Procurement Cost Trend

5. Control Ground Stations (CGS)
5.1. Market Opportunities: Continuity of Operations Beyond-the-line-of-sight

6. Training

7. Service, Support and Maintenance

8. Data Management

9. U.S. Military UAV Market in Figures
9.1. U.S. Military UAV Market 2010-2015 by Sectors
9.2. U.S. Military UAV Market by UAS Groups

List of Figures

Fig. 1- Wasp III
Fig. 2- RQ-11 Raven
Fig. 3- Scan Eagle
Fig. 4- RQ-7B Shadow 200
Fig. 5- Sky Warrior
Fig. 6- Navy Fire Scout
Fig. 7- MQ-1 Predator
Fig. 8- MQ-9 Reaper
Fig. 9- The number of Predator/Reaper sustained orbits in 2010-2015
Fig. 10- RQ-4 Global Hawk
Fig. 11- Potential set of platform capabilities
Fig. 12- NRL’s Ion Tiger Sets 26-Hour Flight Endurance Record
Fig. 13- UCAS-D: An artist’s conception of the X-47B long-range unmanned aerial vehicle on the flight deck of an aircraft carrier
Fig. 14- UAV Procurement Cost, $/kg
Fig. 15- Airborne Signals Intelligence Payload Concept
Fig. 16- Testing GMTI and SAR modes on a Proteus test aircraft
Fig. 17- Sensor Payload Procurement Cost, $/pound
Fig. 18- Line-of-Sight UAS Operational Concept
Fig. 19- Beyond-the-Line-of-Sight UAS Operational Concept
Fig. 20- The number of operators to run the U.S. Military UAV fleet in 2010-2015
Fig. 21- Training flight hours to sustain UAS inventories, Mln Hours
Fig. 22- The number of hours flown by UAVs in Iraq and Afghanistan
Fig. 23- UAV-related Data Flow, Petabytes per year
Fig. 24- Computational Requirements of the U.S. UAV Community, Logarithmic Scale
Fig. 25- U.S. Military UAV Market Forecast 2010-2015, $Mln
Fig. 26- Cumulative U.S. Military UAV Market 2010-2015, market share by sectors, %
Fig. 27- U.S. Military UAV Market Sectors 2010-2015: R&D, UAVs, Payloads and Ground Control Systems, $Mln
Fig. 28- U.S. Military UAV Market Sectors 2010-2015: Service, Training and Data Management, $Mln 61
Fig. 29- U.S. Military UAV Market Forecast 2010 – 1015: R&D, Tests and Evaluation, $Mln
Fig. 30- U.S. Military UAV Market Forecast 2010 – 1015: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, $Mln
Fig. 31- U.S. Military UAV Market Forecast 2010 – 1015: Payloads, $Mln
Fig. 32- U.S. Military UAV Market Forecast 2010 – 2015: Ground Control Systems, $Mln
Fig. 33- U.S. Military UAV Market Forecast 2010 – 1015: Service, Support and Maintenance, $Mln
Fig. 34- U.S. Military UAV Market Forecast 2010 – 2015: Training, $Mln
Fig. 35- U.S. Military UAV Market Forecast 2010 – 1015: Data Management, $Mln
Fig. 36- Cumulative U.S. Military UAV Market 2010 – 2015, Market Share by UAS Groups, %
Fig. 37- U.S. Military UAV Market 2010-2015 by UAS Groups, $Mln
Fig. 38- U.S. Military UAV Forecast 2010 – 1015: Group 1, $Mln
Fig. 39- U.S. Military UAV Forecast 2010 – 1015: Group 2, $Mln
Fig. 40- U.S. Military UAV Forecast 2010 – 1015: Group 3, $Mln
Fig. 41- U.S. Military UAV Forecast 2010 – 1015: Group 4, $Mln
Fig. 42- U.S. Military UAV Forecast 2010 – 1015: Group 5, $Mln

List of Tables
Table 1 – UAS classes by weight, level of operational control and mission focus
Table 2 – UAS groups by vehicle airspeed, weight, and operating altitude
Table 3 – Characteristics of Selected Tactical and Theater-Level Unmanned Aircraft
Table 4 – Key System Capabilities
Table 5 – Military services’ inventories of groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 unmanned aircraft as of beginning 2010
Table 6 – UAV Manufacturers
Table 7 – Video/Electro-Optic/Infrared (EO/IR) Sensor Payloads
Table 8 – Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
Table 9 – Emerging Sensor Technologies
Table 10 – DOD Organizations and Initiatives Addressing UAV Training Challenges
Table 11 – U.S. Military UAV Market Forecast 2010-2015, $Mln
Table 12 – U.S. Military UAV Market 2010-2015 by Sectors, $Mln
Table 13 – U.S. Military UAV Market 2010-2015 by UAS Groups, $Mln

Howard Schmidt, Special Assistant to the President and the Cybersecurity Coordinator, has unveiled previously classified details of the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative (CNCI), a program called to unify agencies’ fragmented approach to cyber security within the federal government. Two initiatives within CNCI, Einstein 2 and Einstein 3, imply wide implementation of Deep Packet Inspection technology to protect federal networks:

“Deploy an intrusion detection system of sensors across the Federal enterprise. Intrusion Detection Systems using passive sensors form a vital part of U.S. Government network defenses by identifying when unauthorized users attempt to gain access to those networks. DHS is deploying, as part of its EINSTEIN 2 activities, signature-based sensors capable of inspecting Internet traffic entering Federal systems for unauthorized accesses and malicious content. The EINSTEIN 2 capability enables analysis of network flow information to identify potential malicious activity while conducting automatic full packet inspection of traffic entering or exiting U.S. Government networks for malicious activity using signature-based intrusion detection technology.”

“The goal of EINSTEIN 3 is to identify and characterize malicious network traffic to enhance cybersecurity analysis, situational awareness and security response. It will have the ability to automatically detect and respond appropriately to cyber threats before harm is done, providing an intrusion prevention system supporting dynamic defense.”

It was an open secret that the U.S. Government is bolstering a program to detect and respond to cyber attacks on government systems and DPI technology was rather obvious choice. A flurry of activity around DPI technology vendors is in the air. A few weeks ago Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)
announced the acquisition of CloudShield Technologies Inc, a cybersecurity and DPI technology provider. CloudShield’s deep packet inspection (DPI) capabilities are expected to enhance SAIC’s cybersecurity offering in the US Federal Government and commercial markets. Small DPI technology vendors may find it difficult to enter the world of federal contracts other than through established federal IT security contractors.

The Deep Packet Inspection market is undergoing a strong revival – it will see explosive growth, more mergers and acquisitions, more fighting with privacy advocates and a whole lot of new applications in cyber defense, signal intelligence, IP traffic monitoring and management.

In 2009, we’ve seen a palpable shift from reactive approach to cyber security to proactive and attitude change of federal CIO’s with regard to Deep Packet Inspection (DPI). While technological advantages of the DPI technology leave no doubt about its significant role in cyber security, lawful interception and data leakage protection, the perception of DPI as “postal employees opening envelopes and reading letters inside” and privacy concerns hurdle its deployment.

Market Research Media conducted a survey to understand the Deep Package Inspection technology deployment in the U.S. Government agencies, present and future growth trends. We interviewed 230 IT executives, 100 in the federal agencies and 130 in the leading federal IT subcontracting companies. Most of the respondents interviewed have a key influence on DPI deployment or recommend cyber security solutions in their organizations/agencies. The third of the respondents are staff providing technical support for the cyber security solutions in use. The survey results and research data are summed up in this new report.

Given the severity of recent Chinese hacking attacks and the potential catastrophic consequences of critical networks disruption, DPI technology is in a favorable position to emerge as a major line of cyber defense for years to come. The U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 36% from 2010 to around US$ 1.8 Billion by 2015. The market will see a few good years of explosive growth in all segments before going flat.

The report answers the following questions:

• Why pay any attention at all to the U.S. Government DPI market?
• What segments of the U.S. Government DPI market are poised for fast growth?
• What are key trends in DPI deployment?
• Will legal hurdles and privacy concerns impede DPI deployment in government networks and DPI use for surveillance & monitoring purposes?
• What are drivers and inhibitors of the U.S. Government DPI market?
• What are market opportunities in providing DPI solutions for Government sector?

The report provides detailed year-by-year (2010 – 2015) forecasts for the following U.S. Government market segments:

• Deep Packet Inspection software, hardware, and services, including installation, support and personnel training;
• Deep Packet Inspection applications for security, Sigint (Signals Intelligence) and network management;
• Deep Packet Inspection market by Defense/Civilian agencies;
• Deep Packet Inspection market by Landline/Mobile networks.

Table of Contents
Deep Packet Inspection (DPI): U.S. Government Market Forecast 2010-2015

1. Market Report Scope & Methodology
1.1. Scope
1.2. Research Methodology

2. Executive Summary
2.1. What are the U.S. Government DPI market drivers and inhibitors?
2.2. What are the U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection market opportunities?
2.3. What is the competitive landscape of the U.S. Government DPI market?
2.3.1. U.S. Federal Government Cyber Security Agencies and Organizations
2.3.2. Federal Cyber Security Contractors
2.3.3. Deep Packet Inspection Technology Vendors
2.4. U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) Market: Key Predictions
2.5. U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market in Figures
2.5.1. U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market by Software, Hardware and Services
2.5.2. U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market by Applications
2.5.3. U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market by Landline/Mobile Networks
2.5.4. U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market by Defense/Civilian Agencies

List of Figures
Fig. 1- U.S. Government-related IP Traffic, 2010-2015
Fig. 2- Do you consider deploying DPI solutions as a result of cyber threat escalation?
Fig. 3- Do you have a clear understanding of DPI technology?
Fig. 4- Will legal hurdles and privacy concerns impede DPI deployment in government networks and DPI use for surveillance & monitoring purposes?
Fig. 5- Competitive Landscape of the U.S. Government DPI Market
Fig. 6- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market Hierarchy
Fig. 7- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market Forecast 2010-2015, $Mln
Fig. 8- Cumulative U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market 2010-2015, market share by sectors, %
Fig. 9- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market 2010-2015 by Sectors, $Mln
Fig. 10- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Hardware Market Forecast 2010 – 1015, $Mln
Fig. 11- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Software Market Forecast 2010 – 1015, $Mln
Fig. 12- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection: Installation, Fine Tuning and Support Services, Market Forecast 2010 – 1015, $Mln
Fig. 13- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection: Personnel Training Market Forecast 2010 – 2015, $Mln
Fig. 14- Cumulative U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market 2010 – 2015, market share by application, %
Fig. 15- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market 2010-2015 by Application, $Mln
Fig. 16- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection: Security (intrusion detection, access control) Market Forecast 2010 – 1015, $Mln
Fig. 17- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection: Sigint & Surveillance Market Forecast 2010 – 1015, $Mln Fig. 18- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection: Network Management Market Forecast 2010 – 2015, $Mln
Fig. 19- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market Dynamics: from Landline to Mobile Network
Fig. 20- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market 2010-2015 by Landline/Mobile Deployment, $Mln
Fig. 21- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection: Landline Deployment, Market Forecast 2010 – 1015, $Mln
Fig. 22- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection: Mobile Deployment, Market Forecast 2010 – 1015, $Mln 30
Fig. 23- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market 2010-2015: Defense Agencies vs. Civilian Agencies, $Mln
Fig. 24- U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market Shares: Defense Agencies vs. Civilian Agencies

List of Tables
Table 1 – U.S. Government-related IP Traffic
Table 2 – U.S. Government DPI Market Drivers and Inhibitors
Table 3 – U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market Opportunities
Table 4 – U.S. Government-related Traffic 2010-2015, Exabyte per year
Table 5 – U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market Forecast 2010-2015, $Mln
Table 6 – U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market 2010-2015 by Software, Hardware and Services, $Mln
Table 7 – U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market 2010-2015 by Application, $Mln
Table 8 – U.S. Government Deep Packet Inspection Market 2010-2015 by Landline/Mobile Network, $Mln 28

]]> http://www.marketresearchmedia.com/2010/02/17/deep-packet-inspection-market/feed/ 0 http://www.marketresearchmedia.com/2010/01/11/cots-is-the-name-of-the-game-for-defense-hpc-market/ http://www.marketresearchmedia.com/2010/01/11/cots-is-the-name-of-the-game-for-defense-hpc-market/#comments Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:30:11 +0000 admin http://www.marketresearchmedia.com/?p=394 COTS, commercial off-the-shelf, and Application Specific Software are the magic words to open today’s tight military budgets for hundreds IT companies seeking to supply High Performance Computing (HPC) technology solutions for defense market. Military computing requirements are growing exponentially while budgets lag behind. As an example let us consider dynamics of the data overflow from military drones in Iraq and Afghanistan:

• The number of hours flown by drones in Iraq and Afghanistan has sharply increased in the last few years – from 50,000 in 2006 to more than 200,000 in 2009
• The Predators and Reapers are already transmitting 16,000 hours of video each month, to be processed and analyzed on the ground.
• Instead of carrying just one camera, the new UAVs, will soon be able to record video in 10 directions at once. By 2011, that will increase to 30 directions with plans for as many as 65 after that. Camera resolution, frame rate and bit depth are growing as well.
• The Air Force’s top intelligence official, Lt. Gen. David A. Deptula, described the situation as “swimming in sensors and drowning in data”.




Market Research Media Ltd forecasts computational requirements of the global Defense HPC community to triple every year to reach 1,000,000 Habu by 2015 (For more information, please see Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015). Habu is a measure of computational performance used by DoD. In 2002, a 1,024-processor IBM system located at the Naval Oceanographic Office MSRC named Habu, was designated the baseline system. Since then computational performance measures are all in “Habu” equivalent units.

As a matter of fact the future computational requirements tend to be grossly underestimated, for example, here is a forecast made in 2005:

“The Department of Defense computational science community will need over 875 HABU equivalents of computing capacity by 2010.” Source: Cray’s press release

The use of COTS have fueled and will fuel growth in Defense HPC Market far beyond expectations. Recently the US Department of Defense, announced that it will upgrade its supercomputer cluster with 2200 Sony’s PlayStation 3 video game console. Here is an excerpt from the order justification form:

With respect to cell processors, a single 1U server configured with two 3.2GHz cell processors can cost up to $8K while two Sony PS3s cost approximately $600. Though a single 3.2 GHz cell processor can deliver over 200 GFLOPS, whereas the Sony PS3 configuration delivers approximately 150 GFLOPS, the approximately tenfold cost difference per GFLOP makes the Sony PS3 the only viable technology for HPC applications. Sony is the only firm capable of manufacturing the brand of required hardware without the Government experiencing substantial duplication of cost that would not be recoverable through competition among providers of alternative technology. Using cell processor technology besides the Sony PS3 would cost the Government the equivalent of several years of professional research and engineering effort, in addition to the initial investment of $118,000 made by ARFL/RIT in 2008. Moreover, moving to an alternative technology hardware would also cause duplication of costs associated with redeveloping the software, military systems, and applications already based on the existing Sony PS3 cluster. This will become increasingly relevant as the magnitude of applications and supporting hardware infrastructure likely will increase over time.

Commercial, off-the-shelf (COTS) HPC software or hardware are often used as alternatives to in-house developments or one-off government-funded developments. The use of COTS HPC solutions in combination with Application Specific Software is being mandated across many government agencies, as such products may offer significant savings in procurement and maintenance, reduction of overall system development and costs, and that’s where opportunities lie.

]]> http://www.marketresearchmedia.com/2010/01/11/cots-is-the-name-of-the-game-for-defense-hpc-market/feed/ 2 http://www.marketresearchmedia.com/2009/10/15/defense-high-performance-computing-hpc-market-forecast-2010-2015/ http://www.marketresearchmedia.com/2009/10/15/defense-high-performance-computing-hpc-market-forecast-2010-2015/#comments Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:24:02 +0000 admin http://www.marketresearchmedia.com/?p=361 If one were to choose a metrics that represents the best national military capacity, the high performance computing power of a nation would win as the most comprehensive measure. More and more countries view supercomputing technology as a symbol of national military power.

High performance computing will be a key technology for meeting national security requirements and to enhance national defense and economic competitiveness. High performance computing contributes substantially to the design and development of advanced vehicles and weapons, planning and execution of operational military scenarios, the intelligence problems of cryptanalysis and image processing, the maintenance of nuclear stockpile, and is a key enabler for science and discovery in security-related fields.

The global defense high performance computing market is projected to increase from $2.6 billion in 2010 to $3.3 billion in 2015. The estimate for worldwide cumulative market 2010 – 2015 is $18 billion, for a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.7% in the 6-year period.

No modern war has been won without technological superiority. No future war will be won without it. The High Performance Computing (HPC) provides many capabilities and tools the military needs to address defense problems. HPC hardware and software can be used to address a wide spectrum of defense-related issues, including: protecting bases of operations through the mitigation of toxic threats; modeling to support certification of new aircraft-store combinations before deployment to conflicts zones; supporting air and space supremacy; conducting climate, weather, and ocean modeling that provides valuable information for countermine warfare; data mining and intelligence analysis, disaster modeling, preparation for emergency operations and humanitarian relief operations throughout the world. These are but a few examples.

The report covers the following market segments, products, technologies and services:

• HPC Servers
• HPC Software (Defense Applications)
• HPC Data Center Infrastructure
• HPC Network Equipment
• HPC Storage
• HPC Hardware & Software Services, Support and Maintenance
• Top markets by geography
• Governmental sector
• Private sector

The report focuses on critical HPC applications in weapons technology, military communications, military simulation, operational weather and ocean forecasting; planning exercises related to analysis of the dispersion of airborne contaminants; cryptanalysis; military platform analysis; survivability/stealth design; intelligence/surveillance/reconnaissance systems; virtual manufacturing/failure analysis of large aircraft, ships, and structures; and biotechnology.

The report provides:

• Worldwide six-year defense HPC market forecast for the period 2010-2015
• Defense high performance computing market segments by infrastructure
• Defense high performance computing market segments by application
• National defense HPC market forecasts for the period 2010-2015 by countries.

Many modern weapons systems present hard problems. Weapons system developers must make tradeoffs to balance performance, time, and available resources. How to balance cost, schedule, and performance? How to take into account technical and management risks? HPC hardware and software contribute to answering these questions.

How much do individual countries plan to spend on defense-related HPC between 2010 and 2015? Where are the major market growth opportunities in military HPC software and hardware over the next six years? How are emerging COTS solutions shaping the market? These critical questions and many more can be answered through our in-depth research, as presented in this report.

Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, Tabular Analysis, Publication: 10/2009, Pages: 80, Figures: 42, Tables: 48, Single User Price: $5,950.00 Reports are delivered in PDF format within 24 hours. Analysis provides quantitative market research information in a concise tabular format. The tables/charts present a focused snapshot of market dynamics. 2CheckOut.com Inc. (Ohio, USA) is an authorized retailer for goods and services provided by Market Research Media Ltd.



Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, Tabular Analysis, Publication: 07/2009, Pages: 80, Figures: 42, Tables: 48, Global Site License: $9,950.00 Reports are delivered in PDF format within 24 hours. Analysis provides quantitative market research information in a concise tabular format. The tables/charts present a focused snapshot of market dynamics. 2CheckOut.com Inc. (Ohio, USA) is an authorized retailer for goods and services provided by Market Research Media Ltd.




Table of Contents
Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015

1. Market Report Scope & Methodology
1.1. Scope
1.2. Research Methodology

2. Executive Summary
2.1. Key Report Findings and Market Trends
2.1.1. Market Trends: COTS (Commercial, off-the-shelf) HPC Technologies
2.1.2. Market Trends: Breaking Petaflop Barrier
2.1.3. Market Trends: Petascale Software Lag
2.1.4. Market Trends: Servers
2.1.5. Market Trends: Storage
2.1.6. Market Trends: Power & Cooling Infrastructure
2.1.7. Market Trends: Network Equipment
2.1.8. Market Trends: Operating Systems
2.1.9. Market Trends: Hardware Installation, Maintenance and Support
2.1.10. Market Trends: Government and Private Market Sectors

3. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing Market Snapshot 2010-2015
3.1. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing Market Forecast 2010-2015 by Countries
3.2. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing Market Forecast 2010-2015 by Infrastructure Segments

3.2.1. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Server Market Forecast 2010-2015 24
3.2.2. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Power & Cooling Infrastructure Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.2.3. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Power Spending Forecast 2010-2015
3.2.4. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Network Equipment Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.2.5. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Storage Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.2.6. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Application Software Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.2.7. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) OS Support Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.2.8. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Hardware Installation, Maintenance and Support Market Forecast 2010-2015

3.3. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing Market Forecast 2010-2015 by Applications
3.3.1. Worldwide Defense HPC CFD Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.3.2. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing CSM Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.3.3. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing IMT Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.3.4. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing FMS Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.3.5. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing SIP Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.3.6. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing CCM Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.3.7. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing CEA Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.3.8. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing CWO Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.3.9. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing ENS Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.3.10. Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing EQM Market Forecast 2010-2015

3.4. National Defense High Performance Computing Markets 2010-2015
3.4.1. US Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.4.2. Japanese Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.4.3. French Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.4.4. UK Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.4.5. German Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.4.6. Spanish Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.4.7. Canadian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.4.8. Italian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.4.9. South Korean Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.4.10. Australian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.4.11. Chinese (PRC) Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.4.12. Saudi Arabian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.4.13. Swedish Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.4.14. Indian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
3.4.15. Turkish Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015
 
List of Figures
Fig. 1-Growth in Supercomputing Power
Fig. 2-Growth in Supercomputing Power: IBM Roadrunner at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)
Fig. 3-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 4-Top 5 Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Markets by Countries 2010-2015, $ 000
Fig. 5-Top Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Markets by Countries (excluding USA) 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 6-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Cumulative Market by Infrastructure Segments, 2010 – 2015
Fig. 7-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market by Infrastructure Segments 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 8- Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Server Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 9-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Power & Cooling Infrastructure Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 10-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Power Spending Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 11-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Network Equipment Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 12-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Storage Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 13- Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Application Software Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 14-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) OS Support Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 15-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Hardware Installation, Maintenance and Support Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 16-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Cumulative Market by Applications, 2010-2015
Fig. 17-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market by Applications 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 18-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing CFD Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 19-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing CSM Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 20-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing IMT Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 21-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing FMS Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 22-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing SIP Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 23-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing CCM Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 24-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing CEA Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 25-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing CWO Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 26-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing ENS Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 27-Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing EQM Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 28-US Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 29-Japanese Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 30-French Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 31-UK Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 32-German Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 33-Spanish Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 34-Canadian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 35-Italian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 36-South Korean Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 37-Australian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 38-Chinese (PRC) Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 39-Saudi Arabian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 40-Swedish Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 41-Indian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Fig. 42-Turkish Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000

List of Tables
Table 1 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $Billion
Table 2 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, by Countries, $000
Table 3 -Defense HPC Market by Government and Private Sector
Table 4 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, by Infrastructure Segments, $Mln
Table 5 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Server Market Forecast 2010-2015, $Mln
Table 6 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Power & Cooling Infrastructure Market Forecast 2010-2015, $Mln
Table 7 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Power Spending Forecast 2010-2015, $Mln
Table 8 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Network Equipment Market Forecast 2010-2015, $Mln
Table 9 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Storage Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 10 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Application Software Market Forecast 2010-2015, $Mln
Table 11 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) OS Support Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 12 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Hardware Installation, Maintenance and Support Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 13 -Military HPC Applications
Table 14 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, by Applications, $000
Table 15 -Defense HPC Markets by Countries and Military HPC Applications
Table 16 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing CFD Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 17 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing CSM Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 18 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing IMT Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 19 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing FMS Market Forecast 2010-2015, $Mln
Table 20 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing SIP Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 21 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing CCM Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 22 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing CEA Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 23 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing CWO Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 24 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing ENS Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 25 -Worldwide Defense High Performance Computing EQM Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 26 -US Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $Mln
Table 27 -Current DoD Challenge HPC Projects
Table 28 -Japanese Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 29 -French Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 30 -UK Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 31 -German Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 32 -Spanish Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 33 -Canadian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 34 -Canadian Defence Research Centers by and Military HPC Applications
Table 35 -Top Canadian HPC Systems
Table 36 -Italian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 37 -South Korean Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 38 -Australian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 39 -Chinese (PRC) Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 40 -Top Chinese HPC Systems
Table 41 -Saudi Arabian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 42 -Swedish Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 43 -Swedish Defense HPC Projects and Programs
Table 44 -Top Swedish HPC Systems
Table 45 -Indian Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000
Table 46 -Indian Defense HPC Projects and Programs
Table 47 -Top Indian HPC Systems
Table 48 -Turkish Defense High Performance Computing (HPC) Market Forecast 2010-2015, $000

]]> http://www.marketresearchmedia.com/2009/10/15/defense-high-performance-computing-hpc-market-forecast-2010-2015/feed/ 0